What Patterns Do You Notice Between The Animals

one. Introduction

Animal coloration is widely involved in mate option, intra-sexual competition, authority relationships and other social interactions, playing a key function in quality signalling [ane]. Most research on colour-based signals of quality has focused on pigment-based traits (especially carotenoids, but also melanins). Under the assumption that pigment bioavailability is the main constraint in colour expression, nearly emphasis has been placed on the acquisition, metabolism and allocation trade-offs of each pigment or its precursors [1]. Derived from this marked interest in 'quantity-dependent' colour expression, near studies have focused on measuring the size or colour intensity/hue of color patches equally proxies of individual quality, irrespective of their product mechanism. Withal, coloured patches often vary amid conspecifics in the shape, distribution and connectivity of their elective units (e.g. spots, stripes and other heterogeneous markings; figure 1). That is, the bodily two- or 3-dimensional pattern of a colour trait can exist highly variable among individuals. Such variability in patterning is largely independent of the surface area or colour intensity of the patch, and may therefore exist bailiwick to other functional constraints, assuasive culling—but not mutually exclusive—signalling pathways and reliability mechanisms for visual traits. Understanding the quality-signalling potential of visual patterns requires a conceptual and empirical change to our arroyo to animal coloration, addressing how they can exist linked to individual quality, how animals perceive them, and what specific tools can be used to quantify these patterns.

Effigy 1. Vi examples of colour patterns for which empirical evidence supporting quality-signalling potential has been reported: (a) white cheek patch of nifty tit (Parus major), (b) black spotted bib of the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa), (c) black 5-shaped foreneck collar of little bustard (Tetrax tetrax), (d) black body patterning of tilapia (Tilapia mariae), (eastward) black clypeal spot of female person paper wasps (Polistes dominula) and (f) body patterning of common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis). Further details are given in table 1. Illustrations courtesy of Francisco J. Hernández. (Online version in colour.)

• Download effigy
• Open up in new tab
• Download PowerPoint

Table 1. Illustrative examples of colour patterns of species from different taxa for which evidence compatible with quality signalling office has been provided (further examples are provided in the electronic supplementary cloth, table S1). Patterns are shown in figure 1.

Collapse

species	colour pattern feature	evidence of its part as quality signal	ref.
great tit (Parus major)	regularity of the white cheek patch borders	Assortative mating according to the pattern, which also determines social status and survival. The design is also positively related to convenance investment and offspring quality	[2–v]
red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa)	fractal dimension of the blackness bib	the pattern reflects male person condition and immunocompetence	[6]
piffling bustard (Tetrax tetrax)	symmetry of the V-shaped foreneck neckband	males with more than symmetric patterns occupy more than competitive leks and are preferred past females	[7,eight]
tilapia (Tilapia mariae)	variable black patterning across the body	pattern expression mediates male's behavioural responses to opponents and reflects motivational country	[9,x]
newspaper wasp (Polistes dominula)	irregularity of the blackness clypeal spot	pattern reflects dominance condition, nutrition during early development and juvenile hormone levels at adulthood; it likewise predicts overwinter survival and convenance success; it is negatively related to parasite prevalence at the population level	[11–17]
common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis)	variable color patterning beyond the body	certain colour patterns reverberate motivational state and mediate agonistic interactions	[18,19]

Here, we review the main examples of quality-signalling colour patterns across brute taxa (§two); propose potential mechanisms by which patterns may reliably signal several aspects of individual quality (§3); summarize relevant analytical tools for objective quantitative descriptions of colour patterns (§4); identify aspects of pattern perception mechanisms that must exist considered to interpret the biological relevance of pattern features (§5); and identify hereafter challenges in this research area (§6).

2. Empirical evidence of quality-signalling colour patterns

Several studies using more holistic pattern descriptions than simply measuring the area or the number of elective elements (e.chiliad. number of spots or stripes) back up the relevance of visual patterns in signalling contexts (effigy 1 and table 1; see the electronic supplementary material, table S1, for a more complete list). Well-nigh evidence comes from birds, but a foremost case is the clypeal black patch of paper wasps (Polistes dominula; table one and figure 1), where shape is used in authorization signalling and is linked to developmental condition and other individual physiological variables. Cichlids provide among the best fish examples, with fast changes among detached colour patterns reflecting the motivational state of the bearer or the outcome of social interactions (electronic supplementary material, table S1). The same applies to cephalopods, which also rely on skin chromophores to display variable color patterns that can alter inside seconds and may reflect dominance relationships in agonistic interactions (electronic supplementary fabric, table S1). Scant show is available for mammals and reptiles, where camouflage, predator–prey communication, thermoregulation or alert signalling are the near commonly suggested adaptive functions attributed to colour patterning. Notwithstanding, interspecific studies suggest that quality signalling is also a likely function in these taxa [20–22], thus encouraging empirical studies at the specific level in candidate mammal and reptile species.

3. Quality-dependent expression of color patterns

Assessing the quality-signalling office of colour patterns requires an understanding of the factors determining differential expression betwixt high- and depression-quality individuals; that is, addressing the information a receiver can extract from the signal and the factors ensuring bespeak reliability. Dissimilar color patterns probably entail different reliability mechanisms co-ordinate to their own architecture, complication, product mechanism, stage of ontogenesis when they are generated, and the particular life history and environmental of the species. Below nosotros suggest 4 non-mutually sectional main pathways that may link private quality to the expression of colour patterns. While melanin is responsible of most colour patterning constitute in animals, these pathways are potentially applicative to patterns resulting from any production mechanism (either pigmentary or structural).

(a) Conventional signals of social status

Traits mediating intraspecific social interactions oftentimes evolve equally conventional signals, or badges of status [23,24]. These traits do non necessarily involve significant production costs, only target receivers penalize the mismatch between sender quality and its signal level through agonistic interactions [24]. Given that the reliability of conventional signals is based on a consensus amidst senders and receivers, betoken grade is not necessarily constrained by a linkage between product machinery and information conveyed [24]. Thus, any color pattern could, in principle, evolve as a bluecoat of status. Withal, for reasons of signalling efficiency, nosotros would look patterns used as badges of condition to exist unproblematic and thus hands discriminable by the receiver (run into §4). In fact, nearly examples of this kind of trait consist of simple colour patches that mainly vary in size between high- and depression-quality individuals [23]. However, there are some examples where more complex pattern features work as a badge of status, like the uniformity of the cheek patch of groovy tits, the black spots of newspaper wasps, or the rapidly variable and land-dependent patterns displayed by cichlids and sure marine taxa (table 1; electronic supplementary material, tabular array S1).

Nevertheless, some degree of status-dependence can also be expected in badges of condition considering signal expression, agonistic behaviour and condition are probable interrelated, and displaying a sure level of the indicate implies a prime physiological country to face up the social costs associated with it [25]. The mechanisms invoked to link physiological state and dominance signalling via colour intensity or size of badges of status frequently involve endocrine or energetic constraints [23], merely the potential effects of these factors on the spatial features of a colour patch are yet to be elucidated. For instance, bear witness from paper wasps indicates that the shape of the clypeal spot is subject to social control by conspecifics, but is as well influenced by torso status during early evolution and is correlated to juvenile hormone levels (an invertebrate coordinating to testosterone), thus supporting the beingness of such links. In whatsoever example, carefully designed experimental prepare-ups [23] are required to tease autonomously the relative importance of social costs and physiological constraints on the production of colour patterns used as badges of status.

(b) Indices of developmental homeostasis

Developmental homeostasis (including developmental stability and canalization) buffers small perturbations that tin cause alterations in the normal developmental process of individuals, leading to fitness reductions [26–28]. In organisms with bilateral symmetry, fluctuating asymmetry is the most ordinarily used estimate of this miracle [26,28] and is ofttimes causeless to behave as a reliable index of individual quality [28]. However, well-nigh studies on fluctuating disproportion have focused on morphological traits, but rarely on colour pattern features (only run into the electronic supplementary material, table S1, for exceptions). This is surprising since morphological traits are likely nether strong stabilizing selection, as even subtle asymmetries in whatsoever structural traits would entail meaning viability costs [28]. By dissimilarity, fluctuating asymmetry of color traits is less likely to entail viability costs. This probably relaxes the selection for tight control over their symmetry, increasing sensitivity to environmental and genetic stress, and allowing them to better reverberate developmental stability.

Beyond fluctuating asymmetry of symmetric traits, the capacity of individuals to express a given pattern can also reveal an individual's developmental homeostasis [26]. The pathway to produce a colour pattern form involves many different steps that must be synchronized at very different temporal and spatial scales (figure 2; e.g. [29,30]). Genetic and environmental perturbations tin touch this process at different levels, causing cumulative deviations from the target pattern, which can be reliable indicators of the incapacity of the individual to buffer the developmental procedure. This is highlighted by a trait architecture that involves the imbrication of different units, like feathers, hairs or scales (figure 2). However, the same basic mechanism applies to taxa lacking these structures (east.grand. invertebrates and amphibians), as the maturation, migration and arrangement beyond the torso of their main coloration units—chromatophores—are equally sensitive to the aforementioned stressors [31].

Figure 2. Schematic of the developmental process of colour pattern formation and how this relates to the four reliability mechanisms discussed in §iii. A melanin-based pattern expressed in a feather trait has been selected equally an illustrative example, although the general scheme tin can be easily translated to other types of traits (peel-, hair- or scale-based). Pattern expression depends on the developmental control of processes that take place at unlike scales and that require a tight spatio-temporal coordination. These include, for instance, the arrangement during early embryonic development of structural units (feather germs) and pigmentary cell precursors (melanocytes) across the torso co-ordinate to the full general pattern layout (i). During structural unit growth, the topology and maturation of undifferentiated (white circles) into differentiated melanocytes (blackness symbols) must exist coordinated with structural unit growth (2). A right synchronization between melanosome production by differentiated melanocytes and their transfer to proliferating keratinocytes is required to elaborate the within-unit pattern fairly (three). Furthermore, these structural units must be developed, arranged and perfectly imbricated to fully display the composite pattern resulting from their combined event (iv). Stressors altering all these steps will exert cumulative effects on the final pattern, which would exist gradually deviated from its optimum. Individual chapters to buffer such deleterious effects will differ among high- and low-quality individuals, making color pattern expression a reliable alphabetize of developmental homeostasis (§3b). Beyond these factors affecting pattern development, individual wearing an undamaged, immaculate and well-groomed plumage, coat or skin will exist able to meliorate display their colour pattern (5), which would then human activity equally an amplifier of somatic integrity (§3c) and investment on maintenance activities (§3d). Finally, overall pattern appearance would elicit variable responses from conspecifics, mediating the reliability of color pattern features equally conventional signals of status (§3a). (Online version in colour.)

• Download effigy
• Open in new tab
• Download PowerPoint

Precipitous and uniform borders, equally well as regular repetition of elements (i.e. confined and spots) probably correspond challenges for developmental buffering mechanisms, particularly in complex forms. Thus, uniformity, regularity and complication are probable candidates as signals of developmental homeostasis. However, in most cases, identifying the optimum brandish a priori would be difficult. To avoid using capricious criteria, the best arroyo would exist to rely on behavioural information (e.g. mate choice or potency tests) to identify the pattern features positively selected under signalling scenarios. Identifying the factors deviating patterns from these optima would then be the next step.

Trait sensitivity to alterations of developmental homeostasis varies across ontogeny [26,28], and this is probably the case for pattern capacity to mirror individual quality. This implies that stressful conditions will only impact pattern expression at certain developmental windows that volition vary amongst species or traits. This is specially relevant for traits in animals that undergo one or multiple moulting processes. In these cases, design sensitivity to individual physiological state during moult can be restricted to early on development or remain open at every moulting outcome, depending on the lability of the precise mechanisms implicated in the expression of each pattern feature. Colour patterns fixed during early development, even though insensitive to physiological land afterwards, are indeed good candidate indices of quality, as stressful conditions early in life oft have long-lasting effects on individual viability [31].

(c) Amplifiers of cues of somatic integrity

The wear of plumage, skin or pelage is frequently related to suboptimal performance, senescence or overall somatic deterioration [2,32,33]. Parasites impose meaning fettle costs to the individual, and in the case of ectoparasites, their action often amercement external host appearance. In add-on, harm, scars and broken or missing feathers or scales are usually the result of close encounters with predators or outcomes of agonistic interactions from which the private did not escape unscathed. It is therefore not surprising that all these alterations of somatic integrity tin be used as cues for private quality cess (e.g. [32,34]).

Cues of somatic integrity would be amplified by certain colour patterns [35]. In fact, this potential role of some plumage decorations was originally selected by Hasson to illustrate the concept of an 'amplifier' (i.e. a trait that increases the resolution of a signal, enhancing the bigotry ability of the receiver) [36], and some empirical evidence supports this. For instance, in bang-up tits (Parus major), cheek patch irregularities often reveal the presence of ectoparasites or injuries caused past conspecifics [2,5]. Similarly, the lateral barred blueprint of the red-legged partridge (Alectoris rufa), resulting from the perfect alignment of flank feathers (figure 1b), is clearly altered by plume loss [37]; interestingly, replacement feathers do not perfectly fill these gaps, leaving traces of traumatic events [37].

This somatic integrity role of color patterns should non exist confounded with the handicapping function of certain markings that increment the hazard of damage, abrasion or degradation by bacteria or ectoparasites, every bit typically proposed for some plume traits [33]. Whereas the latter role is dependent on the size or location of the markings, the amplifying function of somatic integrity is mostly based on the shape of the pattern and the particular architecture of the trait. We advise that traits composed of multiple units and whose imbrication produces a regular design of repeated elements (confined and spots) evenly distributed beyond a given body region are peculiarly decumbent to evolve under this amplifying office.

(d) Amplifiers of toll-added signals of maintenance activities

Preening and grooming activities are essential to remove ectoparasites and maintain the insulating and signalling properties of external teguments. Animals, and particularly vertebrates, spend considerable time and energy in maintenance behaviour [38,39], trading off with other behaviours, such as feeding and vigilance. Given that these grooming and preening activities are particularly important to enhance the conspicuousness of ornamental traits [39], it has been suggested that they function as price-added signals of private quality revealing that the bearer can beget a loftier day-to-day investment [39].

The effective execution of these maintenance activities would be amplified by certain colour patterns. Equally in the previous instance, blended patterns whose right display involves an optimal arrangement of multiple units probably crave higher investment. Combinations of highly contrasting colours, and predominance of white markings, may be particularly used by receivers to assess the signaller's power to keep their pelage, skin or plume in proficient shape.

iv. Methods for quantifying colour patterning

One of the main factors to have hampered our agreement of the functions of colour patterns is the difficulty in quantifying overall pattern appearance. As a simple holistic solution, some studies have relied on qualitative classifications of the patterns (electronic supplementary textile, table S1). This is a reasonable method for clearly distinguishable and discrete forms, such every bit the state-dependent patterns of many cichlid fishes (table i). Withal, this is not advisable for more continuous traits, or when discrete categories are in fact a summary of different contained traits that may point different aspects of private quality (§iii). In recent years, an increasing number of analytical tools and methodological approaches for capturing different aspects of colour patterns have become available. Although in some cases their application to creature color markings is still pending, they constitute promising venues for objectively describing patterns and thus exploring their potential biological office.

(a) Barred patterns and regularity assay

Barred patterns (i.e. those composed by lines or stripes) are widespread across taxa. In those groups where the barred pattern results from lighter and darker elements placed side by side, pattern regularity is one of the well-nigh evident trait features. The freely accessible software developed by Gluckman & Cardoso [40] analyses barred patterns by aligning the coloured bars, and then quantifying deviations from an platonic pattern, where all bars are uninterrupted, of constant widths and with smooth borders betwixt colours. This measure only allows comparisons between equivalent patches among individuals of the same species, but not among different patches or species, because this measure is affected by the gross morphology of the pattern (e.g. the width of the confined) [41]. And then far, this method has simply been practical to the plumages of a few bird species [40]. In mutual waxbills (Estrilda astrild), it has provided compelling show that the regularity of their barred plumage would serve as a quality signal, every bit revealed by its sex-past-age variability and its link to body status [41].

(b) Colour adjacency analysis

Built on the footing of color analyses and visual modelling, the colour adjacency method [42] provides a framework based upon transitions betwixt colour patches that get in possible to estimate blueprint parameters similar color multifariousness, complexity or aspect ratio. The adjacency assay relies on collecting colour characteristics—either past spectrophotometric methods or digital photography—equally in conventional coloration studies. Instead of collecting colour samples in a single patch, they are collected in a big number of points ordered in a grid covering the entire trunk of the animal or the body region of interest. This grid is aligned with a reference body centrality, then that colour measures are encoded into a zone map that allows subsequent adjacency analyses. These let quantifying patch size and the number and orientation of transitions across color patches, thus providing indices of design elongation, regularity and complication, while as well considering the particularities of the visual system of the report species. No specific software has been released for this method, although all procedures can be carried out in R or MATLAB (functions are available from the author) [42].

Adjacency analyses have been used to address the study of the highly variable colour patterning of poisonous substance frogs [43,44]. This arroyo allowed summarizing frogs' dorsal patterns in a few descriptive variables, like the relative contribution of each colour to the forms or blueprint complexity and elongation, which have been shown to be useful to sympathize their biological function [43,44]. However, while this approach is a statistically useful artery to analyse patterns, information technology does not resemble the way that visual systems procedure design information.

(c) Spotted patterns and Fourier and granularity analyses

Substantial earlier work revealed a number of properties of early spatial vision processing across a range of animals, including the presence of receptive fields that respond to contrast, edges and shape data, including in particular orientations (e.1000. [45,46]). Such features are ofttimes processed at dissimilar spatial frequencies (e.k. design sizes) [47]. The appearance of image analysis tools opened upward a broad range of avenues with regards to quantifying patterns, many of them based on spatial frequency techniques, peculiarly Fourier assay. Here, a given design can exist quantified in terms of its contrast, spatial frequency, phase and orientation.

In nature, many patterns are not lines and gratings (e.g. stripes), but rather composed of spots and 'blobs' of dissimilar sizes. A comparatively recent approach to quantify these has been through 'granularity' analysis, whereby images of a given object pattern or scene are Fourier-processed followed past bandpass filtering to create a subset of images containing data at a number of spatial frequency bands, ranging from high (small markings) to depression spatial frequency (big markings). Following this, the corporeality of 'free energy' at each ring tin can be measured, with higher energy corresponding to more than prominent markings. A plot of energy versus spatial frequency produces a 'granularity spectrum', from which a number of descriptive metrics can be obtained, including marking size, contrast and diverseness. This approach has successfully been implemented in various studies describing types of cuttlefish cover-up markings [48,49], as well as pattern mimicry and rejection behaviour of cuckoo-host eggs [fifty]. It is probable that animals reply to multiple metrics derived from such analyses, but that the specific features used vary with species and context. For example, hosts of brood parasites base their egg rejection behaviour on assessing mimicry with regard to egg marking size, dissimilarity, variability and dispersion, but the specific features used and their relative importance varies with species [50,51]. However, to our knowledge, the application of these approaches to the report of quality-signalling patterns is yet pending. These granularity approaches are freely bachelor in a recently released epitome calibration and analyses toolbox [52].

At that place are at least two other approaches here to quantify spot-type patterns. First, contempo work has used an arroyo called Scale Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT), which is substantially a computer vision approach for object and feature recognition at different angles and scales. This has been successfully applied to analysing cuckoo-host egg markings [53]. Some other complementary arroyo used past some authors is to threshold patterns into binary black and white images, and and so mensurate the distribution and coverage of markings over unlike regions of an object [54]. A recent fix of functions called 'SpotEgg' [55] have also been published that permit adaptive thresholding of images to cope with differences in illumination and object shape, while providing information about spot size, distribution, shape and other features such equally fractal dimension (encounter beneath).

(d) Fractal geometry

Fractals are mathematical objects that are self-like beyond scales and whose shape is too complex to be described past Euclidean geometry [56]. Many natural objects are not strictly self-similar, simply tin can be considered 'statistical fractals' and their shape can be successfully described by fractal geometry [56].

There are several types of fractal analyses, but all of them rely on some type of 'fractal dimension', which estimates pattern complication as a scaling rule comparing how a pattern'south particular changes with the scale at which it is considered. Fractal dimension is frequently calculated by box-counting methods, which continue by overlaying the studied pattern by meshes of dissimilar jail cell side lengths, later counting the number cells occupied by the pattern for each mesh size. The scaling dominion of cell size over the inverse of the number of cells occupied past the pattern (both in logarithmic scale) determines its fractal dimension [56]. Fractal dimension can be calculated on lines, surfaces or volumes, capturing the space-filling capacity of the pattern, which is closely related to different backdrop such as the number, length, tortuosity and connectivity of its elements. Importantly, fractal dimension may be sensitive to different trait features for different types of patterns. Therefore, agreement the meaning of the fractal dimension for each blueprint requires a case-by-instance exploration [6]. Nonetheless, irrespective of the item pattern studied, it should be noted that the applicability of this method does not imply that animals are able to detect fractal dimension itself; rather, this mensurate captures variations in sure pattern features that animals tin can detect, but that are difficult to quantify objectively by other methods.

Fractal dimension is the simplest and about pop fractal analysis, but non the only ane. Multifractal analysis provides a much more detailed description of a pattern, where the arrangement (mass distribution) of the pattern is analysed at different scales by the 'singularity spectrum'. 'Lacunarity' is another useful concept from fractal geometry that quantifies the gappiness and heterogeneity of a given pattern, as well as its rotational invariance. Performing nigh of these analyses is relatively straightforward past using freely available software (eastward.yard. Fractaldim, HarFa, FracLac).

Fractal geometry techniques are especially suitable for addressing intricate, complex and heterogeneous patterns. By measuring the continuity of a pattern through scales, information technology somehow mirrors the inherent architecture of many animate being colour traits composed by different units (scales, feathers and hairs), and is thus an interesting tool to capture the variability resulting from such multi-scaled construction of the trait. Still, to date, their awarding to animate being colour patterning has been express [57]. In a recent experimental report, fractal dimension of the blackness bib of the red-legged partridge (figure 1b) was particularly useful to distinguish between individuals with a smooth or a precipitous transition from the plain black to the spotted areas of the bib. This trait feature predicted individual torso status and immune responsiveness, a relationship that remained unnoticed when using simpler measures of the trait [6]. Also, although not from the perspective of quality-signalling, fractal geometry has proved useful to describe butterfly fly patterns [58], and the cranial and shell sutures in mammals and ammonoid taxa [59,60]. The latter examples support the usefulness of fractal dimension to quantify the integrity and regularity of whole colour patches or their borders.

(e) Geometric morphometrics

Geometric morphometrics is the analysis of morphological structures using Cartesian geometric coordinates rather than linear, areal or volumetric variables. I of the chief advantages of this tool is that it allows capturing the shape of an object contained of its size, position and orientation. Object shape is translated into a serial of derived coordinates that are easy to translate and represent, and amenable to a wide array of statistical approaches [61,62].

Geometric morphometrics is based on 'landmarks' (i.e. homologous points that correspond the aforementioned biological location across specimens). Once identified and digitized, landmarks can exist processed past unlike geometric approaches, of which the Procrustes superimposition method is the most widespread [61,62]. The homology requisite of landmarks is usually fulfilled by using clearly identifiable points like cusps, invaginations or intersections.

At that place are several issues that make geometric morphometrics a particularly interesting tool for colour patterning analysis. For instance, it allows describing both in 2- and three-dimensional shapes. This is peculiarly useful to capture color patterns displayed in tridimensional structures, like legs, wings or non-flat areas of the torso, providing these are digitized in a natural display mode. Too, geometric morphometrics permit controlling for potential allometric effects, or for a covariance betwixt body and pattern shape. Another interesting characteristic of geometric morphometrics is its unique potential to capture several types of symmetry, from matching or object symmetry to more complex configurations, like reflection, rotational, translational or spiral symmetries [27]. It as well addresses what specific design features are contributing most to symmetry deviations, which is of great interest for agreement the subjacent mechanisms linking blueprint expression and individual quality (§5).

There are several freely available software tools and R packages for data digitalization, conversion, visualization and analysis of geometric morphometric data (run into life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph). Despite the advantages of geometric morphometrics and availability of gratuitous and user-friendly software, to our cognition no study has applied this set up of powerful tools to the study of colour patterns in the context discussed here.

5. The demand to consider the visual backdrop of the receiver

In recent years, the study of animate being coloration has advanced considerably with the widespread use of objective measures of colour and models of fauna vision. Unlike colour perception, which varies considerably across and fifty-fifty within species [63], many of the general features determining design vision seem to be like even across taxa (at to the lowest degree in low-level vision [64]). This makes modelling certain aspects of pattern vision and producing widely relevant techniques potentially highly tractable.

A number of approaches to quantifying animal patterns have been based on the idea of approximately resembling visual processing, most notably Fourier and granularity analyses (see to a higher place; though note that these algorithms do not mimic real visual systems exactly, but rather broad principles). Other approaches include techniques for quantifying the edges of objects and patterns (east.1000. [65]), although again how exactly edge detection is undertaken by real visual systems is unclear and many models be [64]. Ultimately, any model used needs to exist validated with behavioural data to determine its relevance. In theory, information technology is possible to come upwards with a highly sophisticated model of high-level pattern vision, yet if this misses some key footstep or process establish in real visual systems then this may produce inaccurate results. By contrast, comparatively uncomplicated models of blueprint assessment could produce very effective metrics. The latter is broadly the case for granularity and edge detection approaches, whereby derived design metrics practise effectively predict behavioural responses [50]. Other models may not mimic visual processing pathways closely (east.g. fractal assay) but still derive information that is closely alike to that acquired and used by the receiver.

Ultimately, just as with metrics of colour, we need to test that the values and variation among individuals in pattern metrics coincide with a response by the receiver; that is, that the receiver really sees and responds to that information. This is the key consideration for any pattern quantification tool. If on top of that the model is aimed at mimicking principles of visual processing, then this also allows us to potentially sympathize the visual mechanisms involved. Note, however, that to make more realistic models of design vision, further precise information on blueprint processing is needed, too every bit more information on things such equally display behaviour and angle and distance of viewing by the receiver to the signaller. For case, visual vigil (the power to resolve features of a given sized object) varies considerably with species' visual system and observation altitude, and this will touch how well a receiver can see aspects of blueprint. Furthermore, owing to features of receptive fields and spatial frequency processing (see above), animals differ in their power to detect unlike spatial frequencies at different contrast levels, which can be characterized with a so-called 'contrast sensitivity function' (CSF) [47]. CSFs can depict and compare visual performance at unlike levels of blueprint calibration and contrast among species. Every bit such, incorporating CSF and vigil information (which are available for a range of species) into models of design vision should, in principle, provide a more authentic arroyo to determining the information bachelor from animal markings to the receiver, and tin can allow other information to be considered (such as viewing distances). At nowadays, information on acuity and CSF are rarely incorporated into analyses of beast colour patterns, yet this information could be valuable in determining receiver responses to patterns of different contrast and size from unlike viewing distances.

vi. Concluding remarks and future inquiry directions

In this review, we accept highlighted the potential of beast colour patterning, beyond size and colour intensity, to play a relevant part as reliable signals of individual quality. Available evidence supports this signalling role in a broad array of taxa. The reliability of quality-signalling colour patterns might involve several mechanisms, like social control, impaired developmental homeostasis, somatic deterioration or reduced investment on self-maintenance. Although methodological limitations accept hampered the research of these patterns for a long time, these are no longer a major constraint, as currently available analytical methods allow an objective and accurate quantification of dissimilar pattern features. Yet, the use of these tools must consider relevant aspects of the visual system of the model species and (crucially) behavioural responses, in guild to allow biologically meaningful conclusions.

The different reliability mechanisms proposed here are non mutually exclusive. Indeed, colour patterns may (and probably exercise) deed every bit 'multicomponent signals', where unlike features of a given pattern may inform about different aspects of the bearer or act as back-ups [66]. For instance, the symmetry and uniformity of the markings composing a given plumage pattern could point the stress levels suffered by the individual during early development. But once developed, the ability of the individual to keep undamaged and perfectly arranged all the feathers composing the brandish would amplify its capacity to keep its soma in prime conditions and classify resources to self-maintenance. If the blueprint behaves equally a badge of status, the social costs derived from agonistic interactions can also be added to the system. The specific weight of each reliability pathway will depend on the environmental of the species and the particular architecture of the trait. Experiments would be needed to disentangle the relative importance of each signalling pathway.

A quality-signalling capacity does not preclude the same colour patterns from simultaneously beingness used in other functions, such as thermoregulation, anti-glare, darkening, individual recognition or aposematism [67]. This would be the case, for case, of the facial masks and other common head markings of birds ofttimes causeless to provide anti-glare protection or gaze darkening to predators or opponents [67], but whose expression (regularity of borders, symmetry) might too reflect individual quality (due east.g. [2,viii]). This polyvalent conception of colour patterns tin deactivate, for case, a signalling part and a function in predation avoidance via cover-up or aposematism for a single trait. In the latter case, this would help to explain the obviously paradoxical variability in aposematic patterns observed inside a given species [43].

Understanding the information content of color patterns requires a deep knowledge of the master factors constraining its expression. This is particularly pertinent in the instance of amplifiers of developmental homeostasis (§3b), every bit the reliability of the colour pattern is intrinsically linked to its production mechanism. Understanding how each design characteristic tin can reflect the homeostasis of the developmental process is therefore a major challenge. In this sense, reaction–improvidence models provide a useful framework for studying blueprint formation, both within structural units and across the whole body (east.grand. [68,69]). According to these models, increasing design complexity requires controlling a college number of morphogens and regulatory parameters to achieve the target pattern [68,69]. Such complexity derived from theoretical models predicts the evolutionary pathways and key ecological aspects of patterns in different taxa [70,71]; however, addressing whether increased pattern complexity implies higher lability during development is still pending. This task requires a multidisciplinary arroyo, combining inputs from genetics, biochemistry, physiology and evolutionary developmental biology. Incorporating other reliability mechanisms into the equation (§3) would require behavioural tests and comparative approaches. Unfortunately, to date, evidence of the dissimilar reliability mechanisms discussed here is fragmentary, and comes from very dissimilar written report models. Bringing together behavioural and mechanistic approaches in the same study organization is a pressing task to fully assess the quality-signalling function of colour patterns.

Authors' contributions

Fifty.P.-R. conceived the written report; all authors contributed to manuscript writing.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Funding

During manuscript writing, L.P.-R. was supported by a postdoctoral contract from MINECO through the Severo Ochoa Plan for Centres of Excellence in Research, Development, and Innovation (SEV-2012-0262).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Tomás Redondo for some discussions on signalling theory, to Gonçalo Cardoso for advice on design regularity analysis, and to P. Ferns and an anonymous referee for useful comments. Francisco J. Hernández and Beatriz Gómez Pérez kindly provided illustrations for figures 1 and two, respectively.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3691978.

© 2017 The Author(s)

Published by the Royal Club. All rights reserved.

References

• one
  Espmark Y, Amundsen T, Rosenqvist G

  (eds) 2000 Animal signals: signalling and signal pattern in brute advice . Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Printing. Google Scholar

• 2
  Ferns PN, Hinsley SA

  . 2004 Immaculate tits: head plumage blueprint as an indicator of quality in birds. Anim. Behav . 67 , 261–272. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.05.006) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 3
  Remes V, Matysiokova B, Klejdus B

  . 2011 Egg yolk antioxidant deposition as a function of parental ornamentation, age, and surround in great tits Parus major . J. Avian Biol . 42 , 387–396. (doi:ten.1111/j.1600-048X.2011.05402.ten) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• four
  Remes Five, Matysiokova B

  . 2013 More ornamented females produce college-quality offspring in a socially monogamous bird: an experimental report in the neat tit (Parus major). Front. Zool . 10 , 10. (doi:10.1186/1742-9994-ten-fourteen) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 5
  Galván I, Sanz JJ

  . 2009 Cheek plume uniformity as a social condition signal in great tits. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 46 , 271–282. (doi:x.5735/086.046.0404) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• vi
  Pérez-Rodríguez Fifty, Jovani R, Mougeot F

  . 2013 Fractal geometry of a circuitous feather trait reveals bird'due south quality. Proc. R. Soc. B 280 , 20122783. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2783) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 7
  Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V

  . 2006 Manipulating lek size and composition using decoys: an experimental investigation of lek evolution models. Am. Nat . 168 , 758–768. (doi:10.1086/508808) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 8
  Jiguet F, Bretagnolle V

  . 2014 Sexy males and finicky females on exploded leks: correlates of male bewitchery in the Little Bustard. Behav. Processes 103 , 246–255. (doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.008) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 9
  Baldaccini NE

  . 1973 An ethological study of reproductive behaviour including the colour patterns of the cichlid fish Tilapia mariae (Boulanger). Monitore Zoologico Italiano 7 , 247–290. Google Scholar

• 10
  Slovin M, Rowland WJ

  . 1978 Effects of colour patterns on ambitious beliefs of Tilapia mariae (Boulanger). Behav. Biol. 24 , 378–386. (doi:10.1016/S0091-6773(79)90236-0) Crossref, Google Scholar

• 11
  Tibbetts EA, Dale J

  . 2004 A socially enforced betoken of quality in a paper wasp. Nature 432 , 218–222. (doi:10.1038/nature02949) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 12
  Tibbetts EA

  . 2006 Badges of condition in worker and gyne Polistes dominulus wasps. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 43 , 575–582. ISI, Google Scholar

• xiii
  Tibbetts EA, Curtis TR

  . 2007 Rearing atmospheric condition influence quality signals simply non individual identity signals in Polistes wasps. Behav. Ecol . 18 , 602–607. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arm013) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• xiv
  Tibbetts EA, Lindsay R

  . 2008 Visual signals of status and rival assessment in Polistes dominulus paper wasps. Biol. Lett . 4 , 237–239. (doi:ten.1098/rsbl.2008.0048) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• xv
  Tibbetts EA, Izzo A, Huang ZY

  . 2010 Behavioral and physiological factors associated with juvenile hormone in Polistes wasp foundresses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol . 65 , 1123–1131. (doi:x.1007/s00265-010-1126-6) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• xvi
  Tibbetts EA, Skaldina O, Zhao V, Toth AL, Skaldin Thou, Beani 50, Dale J

  . 2011 Geographic variation in the status signals of Polistes dominulus newspaper wasps. PLoS ONE half-dozen , 8. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028173) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 17
  Tibbetts EA, Forrest T, Vernier C, Jinn J, Madagame A

  . 2015 Socially selected ornaments and fitness: signals of fighting ability in paper wasps are positively associated with survival, reproductive success, and rank. Development 69 , 2917–2926. (doi:x.1111/evo.12793) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 18
  Adamo SA, Hanlon RT

  . 1996 Do cuttlefish (Cephalopoda) signal their intentions to conspecifics during agonistic encounters? Anim. Behav . 52 , 73–81. (doi:x.1006/anbe.1996.0153) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 19
  Palmer ME, Calve MR, Adamo SA

  . 2006 Response of female cuttlefish Sepia officinalis (Cephalopoda) to mirrors and conspecifics: evidence for signaling in female person cuttlefish. Anim. Cogn. 9 , 151–155. (doi:10.1007/s10071-005-0009-0) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 20
  Caro T, Stankowich T

  . 2009 The function of contrasting pelage markings in artiodactyls. Behav. Ecol. 21 , 78–84. (doi:x.1093/beheco/arp165) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 21
  Caro T, Stankowich T, Mesnick SL, Costa DP, Beeman Grand

  . 2012 Pelage coloration in pinnipeds: functional considerations. Behav. Ecol . 23 , 765–774. (doi:10.1093/beheco/ars025) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 22
  Chen IP, Stuart-Fox D, Hugall AF, Symonds MRE

  . 2012 Sexual option and the development of complex color patterns in dragon lizards. Evolution 66 , 3605–3614. (doi:x.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01698.10) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 23
  Senar JC

  . 2006 Colour displays equally intrasexual signals of assailment and authority. In Bird coloration, vol. II: role and evolution (eds

  Hill GE, McGraw KJ

  ), pp. 87–136. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar

• 24
  Guilford T, Dawkins MS

  . 1995 What are conventional signals? Anim. Behav. 49 , 1689–1695. (doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)90090-Ten) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 25
  Tibbetts EA

  . 2014 The development of honest advice: integrating social and physiological costs of ornamentation. Integr. Comp. Biol. 54 , 578–590. (doi:10.1093/icb/icu083) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 26
  Debat V, David P

  . 2001 Mapping phenotypes: canalization, plasticity and developmental stability. Trends Ecol. Evol . 16 , 555–561. (doi:ten.1016/S0169-5347(01)02266-ii) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 27
  Klingenberg CP

  . 2015 Analyzing fluctuating disproportion with geometric morphometrics: concepts, methods, and applications. Symmetry-Basel 7 , 843–934. (doi:10.3390/sym7020843) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 28
  Van Dongen Southward

  . 2006 Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental instability in evolutionary biology: past, present and hereafter. J. Evol. Biol. 19 , 1727–1743. (doi:x.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01175.x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 29
  Lin SJet al.

  2013 Topology of feather melanocyte progenitor niche allows complex paint patterns to emerge. Scientific discipline 340 , 1442–1445. (doi:10.1126/science.1230374) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 30
  Iwata Thousand, Otaki JM

  . 2016 Spatial patterns of correlated scale size and calibration colour in relation to colour pattern elements in butterfly wings. J. Insect Physiol . 85 , 32–45. (doi:x.1016/j.jinsphys.2015.eleven.013) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 31
  Lindstrom J

  . 1999 Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol . fourteen , 343–348. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01639-0) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 32
  Fitzpatrick Southward, Cost P

  . 1997 Magpies' tails: impairment as an indicator of quality. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol . 40 , 209–212. (doi:ten.1007/s002650050334) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 33
  Fitzpatrick S

  . 1998 Birds' tails as signaling devices: markings, shape, length, and plumage quality. Am. Nat . 151 , 157–173. (doi:10.1086/286109) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 34
  Hoglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Ratti O

  . 1994 Context-dependent effects of tail-decoration impairment on mating success in black grouse. Behav. Ecol . 5 , 182–187. (doi:10.1093/beheco/5.ii.182) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 35
  Hasson O

  . 1989 Amplifiers and the handicap principle in sexual selection: a different emphasis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 235 , 383–406. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1989.0006) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 36
  Hasson O

  . 1991 Sexual displays every bit amplifiers: applied examples with an emphasis on plume decorations. Behav. Ecol . 2 , 189–197. (doi:10.1093/beheco/2.3.189) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 37
  Bortolotti GR, Blas J, Negro JJ, Tella JL

  . 2006 A circuitous plumage pattern as an honest social signal. Anim. Behav . 72 , 423–430. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.016) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 38
  Goldstein DL

  . 1988 Estimates of daily free energy expenditure in birds: the fourth dimension-free energy budget equally an integrator of laboratory and field studies. Am. Zool . 28 , 829–844. (doi:ten.1093/icb/28.3.829) Crossref, Google Scholar

• 39
  Walther BA, Clayton DH

  . 2005 Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: prove for loftier maintenance handicaps. Behav. Ecol . xvi , 89–95. (doi:10.1093/beheco/arh135) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• forty
  Gluckman T-50, Cardoso GC

  . 2009 A method to quantify the regularity of barred feather patterns. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol . 63 , 1837–1844. (doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0823-5) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 41
  Marques CIJ, Batalha Hour, Cardoso GC

  . 2016 Signalling with a ambiguous trait: the regularity of barred feather in common waxbills. R. Soc. open sci. three , ix. (doi:x.1098/rsos.160195) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 42
  Endler JA

  . 2012 A framework for analysing colour blueprint geometry: adjacent colours. Biol. J. Linn. Soc . 107 , 233–253. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01937.x) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 43
  Rojas B, Endler JA

  . 2013 Sexual dimorphism and intra-populational colour pattern variation in the aposematic frog Dendrobates tinctorius . Evol. Ecol . 27 , 739–753. (doi:10.1007/s10682-013-9640-four) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 44
  Rojas B, Devillechabrolle J, Endler JA

  . 2014 Paradox lost: variable colour-pattern geometry is associated with differences in movement in aposematic frogs. Biol. Lett . ten , 20140193. (doi:x.1098/rsbl.2014.0193) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 45
  Barlow HB

  . 1953 Summation and inhibition in the frogs retina. J. Physiol . 119 , 69–88. (doi:ten.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004829) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 46
  Hubel DH, Wiesel TN

  . 1962 Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional compages in cats visual cortex. J. Physiol. 160 , 106–154. (doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 47
  Campbell FW, Robson JG

  . 1968 Application of Fourier assay to visibility of gratings. J. Physiol . 197 , 551–566. (doi:ten.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 48
  Barbosa A, Mäthger LM, Buresh KC, Kelly J, Chubb C, Chiao C-C, Hanlon RT

  . 2008 Cuttlefish camouflage: the effects of substrate contrast and size in evoking compatible, mottle or disruptive torso patterns. Vision Res. 48 , 1242–1253. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.011) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 49
  Chiao CC, Chubb C, Buresch K, Siemann Fifty, Hanlon RT

  . 2009 The scaling effects of substrate texture on camouflage patterning in cuttlefish. Vision Res. . 49 , 1647–1656. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.002) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• l
  Spottiswoode CN, Stevens M

  . 2010 Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.s.a. 107 , 8672–8676. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0910486107) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 51
  Spottiswoode CN, Stevens K

  . 2011 How to evade a coevolving breed parasite: egg discrimination versus egg variability as host defences. Proc. R. Soc. B 278 , 3566–3573. (doi:x.1098/rspb.2011.0401) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 52
  Troscianko J, Stevens G, Rands South

  . 2015 Epitome scale and analysis toolbox: a free software suite for objectively measuring reflectance, color and design. Methods Ecol. Evol . 6 , 1320–1331. (doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12439) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 53
  Stoddard MC, Kilner RM, Town C

  . 2014 Design recognition algorithm reveals how birds evolve individual egg design signatures. Nat. Comm . 5 , 10. (doi:ten.1038/ncomms5117) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 54
  Stoddard MC, Stevens Yard

  . 2010 Pattern mimicry of host eggs by the common cuckoo, as seen through a bird'southward eye. Proc. R. Soc. B 277 , 1387–1393. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.2018) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 55
  Gómez J, Liñán-Cembrano One thousand

  . 2016 SpotEgg: an image-processing tool for automatised analysis of colouration and spottiness. J. Avian Biol. 47 , 1–11. (doi:10.1111/jav.00736) Google Scholar

• 56
  Mandelbrot BB

  . 1983 The fractal geometry of nature . New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. Crossref, Google Scholar

• 57
  Jovani R, Pérez-Rodríguez 50, Mougeot F

  . 2013 Fractal geometry for animal biometrics: a response to Kuhl and Burghardt. Trends Ecol. Evol . 28 , 499–500. (doi:x.1016/j.tree.2013.06.004) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 58
  Castrejon-Pita AA, Sarmiento-Galan A, Castrejon-Pita JR, Castrejon-Garcia R

  . 2005 Fractal dimension in butterflies' wings: a novel arroyo to understanding wing patterns? J. Math. Biol. 50 , 584–594. (doi:10.1007/s00285-004-0302-6) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 59
  Gibert J, Palmqvist P

  . 1995 Fractal analysis of the Orce skull sutures. J. Hum. Evol . 28 , 561–575. (doi:10.1006/jhev.1995.1042) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 60
  Perez-Claros JA, Palmqvist P, Oloriz F

  . 2002 Start and 2d orders of suture complexity in ammonites: a new methodological arroyo using fractal analysis. Math. Geol. 34 , 323–343. (doi:ten.1023/A:1014847007351) Crossref, Google Scholar

• 61
  Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL

  . 2004 Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer . London, UK: Elsevier. Google Scholar

• 62
  Mitteroecker P, Gunz P

  . 2009 Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evol. Biol. 36 , 235–247. (doi:x.1007/s11692-009-9055-10) Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar

• 63
  Cronin TW, Johnsen Southward, Marshall NJ, Warrant EJ

  . 2014 Visual ecology . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar

• 64
  Bruce V, Georgeson MA, Light-green PR

  . 2003 Visual perception: physiology, psychology and ecology , 4th edn. Hove, Uk: Psychology Press. Google Scholar

• 65
  Marr D, Hildreth E

  . 1980 Theory of border-detection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 207 , 187–217. (doi:x.1098/rspb.1980.0020) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 66
  Harper DGC

  . 2006 Maynard Smith: amplifying the reasons for signal reliability. J. Theor. Biol . 239 , 203–209. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.034) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 67
  Bortolotti GR

  . 2006 Natural pick and coloration: protection, concealment, advertisement or deception? In Bird coloration, vol. Two: function and evolution (eds

  Hill GE, McGraw KJ

  ), pp. iii–35. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Printing. Google Scholar

• 68
  Murray JD

  . 1981 On pattern-formation mechanisms for lepidopteran wing patterns and mammalian glaze markings. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 295 , 473–496. (doi:x.1098/rstb.1981.0155) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 69
  Prum RO, Williamson S

  . 2002 Reaction–improvidence models of inside-feather pigmentation patterning. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 , 781–792. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1896) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

• 70
  Gluckman T-50, Mundy NI

  . 2016 Evolutionary pathways to convergence in plume patterns. BMC Evol. Biol . sixteen , 172. (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0741-x) Crossref, PubMed, ISI, Google Scholar

• 71
  Allen WL, Cuthill IC, Scott-Samuel NE, Baddeley R

  . 2011 Why the leopard got its spots: relating pattern evolution to ecology in felids. Proc. R. Soc. B 278 , 1373–1380. (doi:ten.1098/rspb.2010.1734) Link, ISI, Google Scholar

Source: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2016.2446

Posted by: bhaktawitheing.blogspot.com

Share this post